ILLUSTRATIVE REVIEW AND HANDOFF — not a customer result or app-run log.

Batch: product listings / version 1 / 12 fictional SKUs.
Files: filled-product-listing-sop.txt, products-source.json,
listing-drafts-v1.json and this review-and-handoff.txt.

Sample review example:
Proposed wording for PCH-001: "Eco-friendly Sand Cotton Pouch".
Reviewer decision: remove "Eco-friendly"; no evidence is supplied.
Final title: "Sand Cotton Drawstring Pouch, 12 × 16 cm".
This is an editorial example of a correction, not a recorded model response.

Batch check:
12 source SKUs and 12 draft records, each SKU exactly once.
All titles within 70 characters; descriptions within 20–45 words;
three source-grounded bullets per record.
11 ready for owner review; PCH-012 needs owner input on care instructions.
No item has been approved or published. No store access or paid service
was used to assemble this fictional packet.

Next decision: Maya supplies PCH-012's approved care instructions or
explicitly approves a listing without care advice. Then Leo revises that
record, saves version 2, and identifies it in the new handoff.

For an Orkas handoff, upload these files to the shared project's Library,
then confirm that the reviewer can retrieve and open the same versions.
That receiving-account step was not performed for this editorial example.